RSS's and Manuwad ideology is dangerous than Naxalism

Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy rightly rejected the notion that Nasalism is solely a law and order problem that can be resolved by force. He asserted that it is an "ideology" that stems from social and economic inequalities.

BJP leader and Minister of State (Home Affairs) not right to allege that Congress has links with former Naxalites and with Naxal sympathies. Naxalism stems from social and economic inequalities.

It is a philosophy and ideology which opposes the rigid fundamental and rigid behavioral of the God in all forms. It believes in scientific behavior.  Most of that philosophy believes give in their will to donate their bodies to the medical colleges for the use of their bodies for research and medical knowledge.

It is false on the part of the Junior Union Home Minister Bandi Sanjay Kumar.  A prominent Telangana BJP leader, Bandi Sanjay Kumar, has criticized Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy, accusing him of disrespecting the thousands of lives lost to Naxal violence, including civilians and police personnel, by referring to Naxalism as a "philosophy" that cannot be finished.

The BJP leader questioned whether Mr Reddy, as the state's Home Minister, had any respect for the sacrifices made by the Telangana police. All the Government has paramount respect to the police. It is false to allege that the Congress government has links with former Naxalites and with Naxal sympathies, claiming this is a "conspiracy" to push Telangana's youth back into extremism.

Mr Sanjay reiterated the Central government's commitment to a "Naxal-free India" and asserted that the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government would eradicate leftwing extremism by March 2026. The BJP should believe in letter and spirit that the Constitution and democracy stand above violent extremism. Whereas the BJP and Sangh have last respect to the constitution and the law of the land while they practice Manusmriti Constitution and do not believe that the Shudra should have fundamental rights. Like RSS brain washes a good sanathani to commit  atrocities like lynching Muslims, Dalits and Christians. In fact Manuwadies are worst than the terrorist. Like Manuwadies  the Naxalites have their philosophy

The political firestorm was ignited by Revanth Reddy's defence of the INDIA bloc's vice-presidential candidate, former Supreme Court Justice B Sudarshan Reddy. The Chief Minister urged all Telugu-speaking MPs to support Justice Reddy, whom he referred to as a "Telugu Bidda" (Telugu son).  While Bandi Sanjay Kuma is not considered as an intellectual.

Chief Minister Reddy rejected the notion that Nasalism is solely a law and order problem that can be resolved by force. He asserted that it is an "ideology" that stems from social and economic inequalities.

He stated that the Congress party's core policies, such as the Land Ceiling Act and the Forest Rights Act, are aimed at addressing these root causes and also emphasized that the Congress government views Naxalism from a social perspective, not just a law enforcement one.

Chief Minister Revanth Reddy was reacting to a statement made by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who had claimed that Left-Wing Extremism would have been eradicated by 2020 had it not been for the Supreme Court's 2011 judgment on Salwa Judum.

RSS's Manuwad is dangerous than  Naxalism

Mr Shah's comments were widely seen as a direct attack on Justice B Sudarshan Reddy, who was one of the authors of the judgment and is now the opposition's vice-presidential candidate.

The 2011 judgment, in the case of Nandini Sundar vs State of Chhattisgarh, had declared the arming of tribal youth as Special Police Officers (SPOs) in the anti-Maoist militia, Salwa Judum, as unconstitutional.

The court emphasized that the state could not "outsource" its duty to maintain law and order and urged a focus on the underlying socio-economic issues.

Mr Shah's remarks have been condemned by a group of 18 retired judges who called the interpretation of the judgment "unfortunate" and warned of a "chilling effect" on the judiciary.

They noted that the judgment was never meant to stop the fight against Naxalites, but rather to ensure that the state's actions were constitutional and Indian sovereignty above all.